MERIT DOCKET, 76 Ohio St.3d 1403 (1996)

666 N.E.2d 564-570Supreme Court of Ohio.
1996.

MERIT DOCKET Wednesday, July 3, 1996 96-417. State ex rel. Yontz v. Netting. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.

96-691. Marcella v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. Cuyahoga County, No. 69086. On review of order certifying a conflict. Sua sponte, cause dismissed for want of a proper order certifying a conflict within the meaning of S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(A).

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.

STRATTON, J., not participating.

96-786. State ex rel. Better Built Homes of Hillsboro, Inc. v. Armstrong. In Mandamus. On motion for judgment on pleadings of Wanda E. Armstrong, answer of respondent Wanda E. Armstrong, answer of respondent William Fawley, and motion to dismiss of William Fawley. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.

PFEIFER, J., dissents and would grant the writ.

96-787. State ex rel. Quinn v. Davies. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.

96-975. State ex rel. Shie v. Ninth Dist. Court of Appeals. In Mandamus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.

96-1051. State ex rel. Massie v. Wilkinson. In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.

96-1058. State ex rel. Young v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.

96-1075. State ex rel. Brown v. Wilkinson. In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.

96-1083. State ex rel. Ballard v. Lucas Cty. Court of Appeals. On motions to dismiss. Motions to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.

RESNICK, J., not participating.

96-1133. State ex rel. Flynn v. Mt. Vernon Mun. Court. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.

Page 1404

96-1220. Gordon v. Mackey. In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.

96-1285. Robinson v. Hamilton Cty. Court of Common Pleas, Juv. Div. In Prohibition. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.

96-1387. State ex rel. Rife v. Klosterman. In Mandamus and Prohibition. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.

96-1492. State ex rel. Wireman v. Warren. In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the writ of prohibition be, and hereby is, denied, and this cause is dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD. v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC., 53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)

53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…

2 years ago

McCAMMON v. COOPER, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904)

McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…

5 years ago

BANK OF AM., N.A. v. SMITH, 2018-Ohio-3638

[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…

7 years ago

STATE v. MARCUM, 2018-Ohio-1009 (2018)

[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…

8 years ago

In re A.F., 2018-Ohio-310 (Oh. App. 1/26/2018)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…

8 years ago

Ohio Attorney General Opinion No. 2017-007

March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…

8 years ago