737 N.E.2d 51Supreme Court of Ohio.
2000.
MERIT DOCKET ANNOUNCEMENT, TUESDAY, October 24, 2000
00-1830. State ex rel. Ohio Heritage Dev. Co. v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Elections.
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition regarding an expedited election matter and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the writ of prohibition be, and hereby is, denied.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., would deny the writ based on laches.
00-1844. State ex rel. Streicher v. Ruehlman.
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of the city of Cincinnati’s motion for stay of trial court proceedings or temporary restraining order,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay or temporary restraining order be, and hereby is, denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
F.E. Sweeney, J., would only deny the motion.
Douglas, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.
Page 1447