MILUM v. DEPT. OF REHAB. CORR., 2005-07909 (9-2-2008)

2008-Ohio-4802

No. 2005-07909.Court of Claims of Ohio.
Filed September 2, 2008.

Anne M. Valentine, Gerald S. Leeseberg, Columbus, Ohio, Magistrate Steven A. Larson.

Brian M. Kneafsey Jr., Stephanie D. Pestello-Sharf, Susan M. Sullivan, Assistant Attorneys General, Columbus, Ohio.

Page 2

JUDGMENT ENTRY
JOSEPH T. CLARK Judge.

{¶ 1} On July 18, 2008, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for plaintiff.

{¶ 2} Civ. R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: “A party may file written objections to a magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by Civ. R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i).” Defendant timely filed objections.

{¶ 3} Upon review of the record, the magistrate’s decision and the objections, the court finds that the magistrate has properly determined the factual issues and appropriately applied the law. Therefore, the objections are OVERRULED and the court adopts the magistrate’s decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein.

{¶ 4} Judgment is rendered for plaintiff. The case will be set for trial on the issue of damages.

Page 1