2003-Ohio-5098, 796 N.E.2d 939Supreme Court of Ohio.
2003.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS
Case Announcements and Administrative Actions September 29, 20032003-0334. State v. Tabbaa.
Cuyahoga App. No. 81410, 151 Ohio App.3d 353, 2003-Ohio-299. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
2003-1243. Strongsville Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. ofRevision.
Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2002-T-2572 and 2002-T-2573. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due September 22, 2003, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed, sua sponte.
2003-1398. Daniels v. Wilson.
Montgomery App. Nos. 19403 and 19421, 2003-Ohio-3399. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellants’ application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
2003-1500. Druck v. Dynalectric Co. of Ohio.
Montgomery App. No. 19688, 2003-Ohio-3767. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Page 1418