2004-Ohio-1727, 806 N.E.2d 167Supreme Court of Ohio.
Case Announcements and Administrative Actions, April 6, 2004.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-1503. State ex rel. Hayes v. Indus. Comm.
Franklin App. No. 01AP-1087, 2002-Ohio-3675. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. It appearing to this court that no briefs have been filed in this case,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is dismissed, sua sponte
2003-1070. Gabbard v. Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp.
Franklin App. Nos. 02AP-976 and 02AP-1168, 2003-Ohio-2265. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of the joint application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
2003-1901. State ex rel. Campbell v. Indus. Comm.
Franklin App. No. 02AP-1253, 2003-Ohio-4824. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. It appearing to this court that no briefs have been filed in this case; therefore,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is dismissed sua sponte.
2003-2011. State v. Skatzes.
Montgomery App. No. 15848, 2003-Ohio-516. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from a decision of a court of appeals under App.R. 26(B) in a case involving the death penalty. Whereas, appellant’s merit brief was filed beyond the deadline for filing and should have been rejected by the Clerk pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C),
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s merit brief be, and hereby is stricken.
Whereas, the appellant is not in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and has failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this case be, and hereby is, dismissed.
2004-0553. State ex rel. Walton Hills v. Bedford City Bd. ofEdn.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.