556 N.E.2d 186-190Supreme Court of Ohio.
1990.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSIALS Thursday, June 7, 1990 89-1517. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pub. Util. Comm. Public Utilities Commission, No. 88-1288-RR-CSS. This cause, here on appeal from the Public Utilities Commission
Page 714
of Ohio, was considered in the manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration of the joint motion to dismiss, it is ordered by the court that said joint motion be and the same is hereby, sustained. It is further ordered by the court that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, effective May 31, 1990. It is further ordered that the appellee recover from the appellant its costs herein expended; and that a mandate be sent to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio to carry this judgment into execution; and that a copy of this entry be certified to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio for entry.
89-2218. Milarcik v. Demis. Tuscarawas County, No. 89AP100076. Cause dismissed, on appellant’s application to dismiss, effective June 5, 1990.
90-494. State v. Steen. Wood County, No. WD-88-57. Sua sponte, cause dismissed for want of prosecution, effective May 25, 1990.
90-670. State, ex rel. Thrower, v. Shifrin. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s application to dismiss, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said application be, and the same is hereby, granted, effective May 31, 1990.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
90-939. State, ex rel. Arnwine, v. Kessler. Montgomery County, No. 11123. Cause dismissed, on appellant’s application to dismiss, effective June 5, 1990.
Page 1