MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS, 71 Ohio St.3d 1410 (1994)

641 N.E.2d 1108-1112Supreme Court of Ohio.
1994.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSIALS Thursday, November 17, 1994 93-2496. LiTel Telecommunications Corp. v. Tracy. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 91-A-1524. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application be, and the same is hereby, granted, effective November 14, 1994.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

93-2538. Parma v. Hampar. Cuyahoga County, No. 63880. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Appellant’s motion to file memorandum in support of jurisdiction instanter was denied on March 2, 1994. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte, effective November 14, 1994.