675 N.E.2d 473, 474Supreme Court of Ohio.
1997.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSIALS Wednesday, February 12, 199795-457. State ex rel. Whitmer v. Indus. Comm.
Franklin App. No. 94APD01-59. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Consolidated case No. 95-490, State ex rel. Whitmer v. Indus. Comm., Franklin App. No. 94APD01-59, remains pending.
96-1352. In re Robinson.
Hamilton App. No. C-960350. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due July 22, 1996, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte.
97-13. Coventry Edn. Assn. v. Coventry Local School Dist. Bd. ofEdn.
Summit App. No. 17795. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.