770 N.E.2d 74Supreme Court of Ohio.
2002.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS Case Announcements and Administrative Actions June 21, 20022002-0565. State ex rel. Triplett v. Vivo.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal,
Page 1402
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
2002-0714. Long v. MacDonald.
Crawford App. No. 30210. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellants have not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due June 10, 2002, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore have failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is dismissed, sua sponte.