787 N.E.2d 7Supreme Court of Ohio.
2003.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS
Case Announcements and Administrative Actions April 22, 20032002-1847. Univ. of Cincinnati Med. Assoc., Inc. v. Zaino.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 99-A-1413. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. It appears from the records of this court
that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due April 15, 2003, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed, sua sponte.
2002-1848. Univ. of Cincinnati Med. Assoc., Inc. v. Zaino.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 99-A-1411. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due April 15, 2003, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed, sua sponte.
2002-1849. Univ. of Cincinnati Med. Assoc., Inc. v. Zaino.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 99-A-1412. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. It appears from the records of this court
that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due April 15, 2003, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed, sua sponte.
2002-1879. State v. Johnson.
Cuyahoga App. No. 80459, 2002-Ohio-4581. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due April 14, 2003, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed, sua sponte.
Page 1545
2002-1958. White v. Am. Mfgs. Mut. Ins. Co.
Montgomery App. No. 19206, 2002-Ohio-4125. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
2003-0638. State ex rel. Felson v. Kennedy.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.