MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS, Unpublished Decision (5-3-2005)

2005-Ohio-2106

Supreme Court of Ohio.
May 3, 2005.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS
2004-1925. State ex rel. Pactive Corp./Tenneco Packaging v. Harvey.

Franklin App. No. 03AP-1272, 2004-Ohio-5158. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

2005-0715. State v. Tanner.

Medina App. No. 04CA0062-M, 2005-Ohio-998. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due April 25, 2005 in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte.

2005-0717. Garcia v. O’Rourke.

Gallia App. No. 04CA7, 2005-Ohio-1034. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On April 22, 2005, an appeal was filed from the same court of appeals decision being appealed in this case and was assigned case No. 05-0710. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that a copy of the notice of appeal filed in this case be deemed as a second notice of appeal in case No. 05-0710.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appeals shall proceed under case No. 05-0710 and that this cause is therefore dismissed.