656 N.E.2d 690-693Supreme Court of Ohio.
1995.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET Friday, November 3, 1995
In re Report of the Commission : 1995 TERM on Continuing Legal Education. : : To wit: November 2, 1995 Joseph Bancsi : (#0025450), : ENTRY Respondent.
This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(1)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1992-1993 reporting period.
On August 11, 1995, this court adopted the recommendation of the commission, imposed a sanction fee upon the respondent and suspended the respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(3), and Gov.Bar R. X(5)(A)(4). The court further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until respondent complies with the requirements for reinstatement set forth in Gov.Bar R. X(7).
On October 5, 1995, the commission filed a recommendation pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(7)(B)(2), finding that the respondent has paid all fees assessed for noncompliance, has made up all deficiencies and is now in full compliance with all requirements of Gov.Bar R. X, and recommending that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the recommendation of the commission is adopted and respondent, Joseph Bancsi, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law.
In re Report of the Commission : 1995 TERM on Continuing Legal Education. : : To wit: November 2, 1995 Jack Patrick Bunce : (#0033229), : ENTRY Respondent.
This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(1)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1992-1993 reporting period.
On September 21, 1995, this court adopted the recommendation of the commission, imposed a sanction fee upon the respondent and suspended the respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(3), and Gov.Bar R. X(5)(A)(4). The court further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until respondent complies with the requirements for reinstatement set forth in Gov.Bar R. X(7).
On October 16, 1995, the commission filed a recommendation pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(7)(B)(2), finding that the respondent has paid all fees assessed for noncompliance, has made up all deficiencies and is now in full compliance with all requirements of Gov.Bar R. X, and recommending that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. Upon consideration thereof,
Page 1450
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the recommendation of the commission is adopted and respondent, Jack Patrick Bunce, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law.