677 N.E.2d 1205-1206Supreme Court of Ohio.
1997.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET Monday, April 14, 1997
In re Report of the Commission : 1997 TERM on Continuing Legal Education. :
Kevin Thomas Connor (#0042442), : ENTRY Respondent.
This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(1)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1994-1995 reporting period.
On January 27, 1997, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(3), this court entered an order adopting the commission’s recommendation and imposing a sanction upon the respondent.
On February 10, 1997, the commission filed a motion to vacate, requesting that the order of January 27, 1997, pertaining to certain respondents, including the above-named respondent, be vacated. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to vacate be, and hereby is, granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the order of January 27, 1997, pertaining to respondent, is hereby vacated and this cause is dismissed.
In re Report of the Commission : 1997 TERM on Continuing Legal Education. :
Edward Crotty (#0045220), : ENTRY Respondent.
This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(1)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission
Page 1460
recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1994-1995 reporting period.
On January 27, 1997, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(3), this court entered an order adopting the commission’s recommendation and imposing a sanction upon the respondent.
On February 10, 1997, the commission filed a motion to vacate, requesting that the order of January 27, 1997, pertaining to certain respondents, including the above-named respondent, be vacated. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to vacate be, and hereby is, granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the order of January 27, 1997, pertaining to respondent, is hereby vacated and this cause is dismissed.