MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS, 100 Ohio St.3d 1474 (2003)

2003-Ohio-5917, 798 N.E.2d 408Supreme Court of Ohio.
2003.

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
Announcement November 6, 2003 2003-1598. Schirmer v. Brown Cty. Court of Common Pleas, Div. ofDomestic Relations.

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for leave to file amended complaint,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to file amended complaint be, and hereby is, granted, and relator’s amended complaint shall be filed within seven days of the date of this entry. Respondent’s response to the amended complaint shall be due within fourteen days after the filing of relator’s amended complaint.

2003-1696. Lewis v. Kiser.

Shelby App. No. 17-03-05, 2003-Ohio-4253. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. The name of Jeffery A. Kaleda, Attorney Registration No. 0069149, is listed as counsel for appellant in this case. Whereas Jeffery A. Kaleda is not registered for active status as an attorney in this state pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VI, and as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. I(1),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the name of Jeffery A. Kaleda be, and hereby is, stricken from this case and that Jeffery A. Kaleda shall not be permitted to participate in this case.