774 N.E.2d 1220Supreme Court of Ohio.
2002.
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
Case Announcements and Administrative Actions September 6, 20021985-0712. State v. Buell.
Cuyahoga App. No. 48621. By entry filed July 11, 2002, this court ordered that appellant’s sentence be carried into execution on Wednesday, the 25th day of September, 2002. In order to facilitate this court’s timely consideration of any matters relating to the execution of appellant’s sentence,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the Chief Justice may suspend application of any provisions of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court, including, but not limited to, the filing requirements imposed by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that service of documents as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2) shall be personal or by facsimile transmission.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that counsel of record for the parties shall supply this court with a copy of any document relating to this matter that is filed in, or issued by, any other court in this state or any federal court, as well as any commutation, pardon, or warrant of reprieve issued by the Governor. A copy of the document shall be delivered to the Office of the Clerk as soon as possible, either personally or by facsimile transmission.
2002-1494. State ex rel. Talley v. Gorman.
Montgomery App. No. 19172. This cause was filed as a discretionary appeal. Upon review of appellant’s jurisdictional memorandum, it is determined by the court that this cause originated in the court of appeals and therefore should proceed as an appeal as of right pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(1)(A)(1).
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County and that the parties shall proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.