MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS, 98 Ohio St.3d 1433 (2003)

782 N.E.2d 589Supreme Court of Ohio.
2003.

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
Case Announcements and Administrative Actions January 30, 20032002-1454. State ex rel. Weist v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relators’ motion for extension of time to file relators’ merit brief pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for extension of time be, and hereby is, granted, and relators’ merit brief is due on or before February 25, 2003.

2002-1455. State ex rel. Weist v. Mason.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relators’ motion for extension of time to file relators’ merit brief pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for extension of time be, and hereby is, granted, and relators’ merit brief is due on or before February 25, 2003.

2002-1677. JL Power Equip., Inc. v. Zaino.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 97-A-535. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant/cross-appellee’s motion for extension of time to file appellant/cross-appellee’s merit brief pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for extension of time be, and hereby is, granted, and appellant’s merit brief is due on or before March 3, 2003.