548 N.E.2d 241-245Supreme Court of Ohio.
1989.
MOTION DOCKET Tuesday, December 5, 1989 88-662. State v. Dickerson. Lucas County, No. L-85-433. UPON CONSIDERATION of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay execution of sentence in the above-styled cause pending the timely filing of an appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is hereby, granted, effective November 30, 1989.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that compliance with the mandate and execution of sentence be, and the same are hereby, stayed pending the timely filing of an appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if such appeal is timely filed, this stay shall continue for an indefinite period pending final disposition of this cause by the Supreme Court of the United States.
Moyer, C.J., not participating.
89-2034. State, ex rel. Musser, v. Massillon. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for an alternative writ, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective December 4, 1989. Sua sponte, the writ is denied and this cause is dismissed.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
Douglas, J., would deny the motion to expedite and allow fourteen days for respondents to answer.
Resnick, J., would grant the motion for an alternative writ.