557 N.E.2d 1210-1220Supreme Court of Ohio.
1990.
MOTION DOCKET Tuesday, July 3, 1990 87-1985. State v. Bradley. Scioto County, No. 1583. This court received notification from the Supreme Court of the United States that said court on June 25, 1990, entered an order in No. 89-5346, William J. Bradley v. Ohio, which stated:
“On consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari herein to the Supreme Court of Ohio, IT IS ORDERED by this Court that said petition be, and the same is hereby, denied.”
Upon consideration that the stay of execution of sentence granted by this court on July 5, 1989, was conditioned upon final disposition of said petition to the Supreme Court of the United States, and it appearing to this court that the Supreme Court of the United States has rendered such final disposition of said petition,
IT IS ORDERED that said stay is hereby terminated as of the date of this entry, June 29, 1990.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by this court that said sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden on Thursday, the 27th day of September, 1990, in accordance with the statutes so provided.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that said Warden shall make due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Scioto County.
89-693. Ketchel v. Bainbridge Twp. Geauga County, No. 1330. On motion for leave to file supplemental brief. Motion denied, effective June 27, 1990.
90-1191. State, ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co., v. Patterson. In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for an alternative writ of prohibition and to advance case on the docket, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be granted to the extent that respondent, John T. Patterson, Judge, show cause within ten days why the writ of prohibition should not be issued.