568 N.E.2d 688-701Supreme Court of Ohio.
1991.
MOTION DOCKET Tuesday, February 12, 1991 91-218. Cleveland v. Iacampo. Cuyahoga County, No. 57796. This cause is pending before the court on the filing of a motion for an order directing the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County to certify its record. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for bail pending appeal, IT IS ORDERED by the court that appellee show cause, on or before February 20, 1991, why said motion should not be granted.
Holmes, J., would grant the motion and set a $4,000 surety bond.
Sweeney and H. Brown, JJ., would grant the motion.
91-249. State v. Stanley. Ross County, No. 1569. This cause is pending before the court on the filing of a motion for leave to appeal from the Court of Appeals for Ross County and as an appeal as of right from said court. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to continue stay of execution, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion to continue stay be, and the same is hereby, granted, and the stay of execution previously issued in this matter by the Ross County Court of Appeals is continued.
Holmes, J., dissents.
91-262. W.O. Brisben Co. v. Montgomery. Hamilton County, No. C-890502. This cause is pending before the court on the filing of a motion for an order directing the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County to certify its record and as a claimed appeal as of right from said court. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to stay execution of judgment pending this court’s determination as to jurisdiction, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for stay be, and the same is hereby, granted.
Douglas, J., dissents.
91-268. State, ex rel. Capers, v. Hughes. In Quo Warranto. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition for a writ of quo warranto. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for issuance of an alternative writ, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion is granted, effective February 11, 1991, to the extent that respondents are ordered to show cause, on or before March 4, 1991, why a peremptory writ should not be issued.
Douglas, J., would dismiss this cause pursuant to Civ. R. 12(B)(6).