573 N.E.2d 665-676Supreme Court of Ohio.
1991.

MOTION DOCKET Monday, May 20, 1991 89-454. State v. Landrum. Ross County, No. 1330. UPON CONSIDERATION of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay the execution of sentence in the above-styled cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is hereby, granted, effective May 16, 1991.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that said stay is granted for a period of six months to allow appellant an opportunity to file a petition for post-conviction relief. Absent such a filing within said time period, this stay will expire, and no further time will be granted except in unusual circumstances.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that if a petition for post-conviction relief has been filed within the time allotted, a date-stamped copy of such petition shall be filed by appellant with the Clerk of this court, and this stay shall remain in effect until exhaustion of all state post-conviction proceedings, including any appeals.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the compliance with the mandate and execution of sentence be, and the same are hereby, stayed, for a period of six months or, if a petition for post-conviction relief is filed within that time period, pending the exhaustion of all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state.

91-909. Baker v. Fairview General Hosp. Cuyahoga County, No. 61315. This cause is pending before the court on the filing of a motion for an order directing the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County to certify its record and as a claimed appeal as of right from said court. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for stay be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective May 14, 1991.

Holmes, J., dissents.

91-913. State v. Laudato. Cuyahoga County, No. 58211. This cause is pending before the court on the filing of a motion for leave to appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County and as a claimed appeal as of right from said court. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for appeal bond,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for appeal bond be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective May 15, 1991.