598 N.E.2d 13Supreme Court of Ohio.
1992.
MOTION DOCKET Wednesday, September 9, 1992 92-1452. Lake Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Weaver. Lake County, No. 89-L-14-076. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lake County. Upon consideration of appellant/cross-appellee’s motion to stay enforcement of the judgment rendered by the Eleventh District Court of Appeals on June 9, 1992, ordering the appellant/cross-appellee to appropriate $133,845.96 to appellees/cross-appellants for the operation of the juvenile court,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, effective September 8, 1992, that said motion for stay be, and the same is hereby, granted, pending final disposition by this court.
H. BROWN, J., would require a cash bond of $185,000 and would deny the stay without the posting of the bond.
RESNICK, J., would set a supersedeas at $300,000.
92-1625. Mid Fed Savings Bank v. Martin. Butler County, No. CA91-12-202. This cause is pending before the court on the filing of a motion for an order directing the Court of Appeals for Butler County to certify its record. Upon consideration of appellants’ motion for stay and for supersedeas bond,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for stay and for supersedeas bond be, and the same is hereby, denied.
SWEENEY, J., dissents and would set bond at $1,500.
92-1809. State ex rel. White v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections. In Prohibition or Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and/or writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter.
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the following schedule shall apply in this case. Respondents shall answer within three days after service of summons. Relators’ brief, and any evidence relators intend to present, shall be due within three days after filing of the answer. Respondents’ brief(s), and any evidence respondents intend to present, shall be due within three days after the filing of relators’ brief.