613 N.E.2d 1043-1048Supreme Court of Ohio.
1993.
MOTION DOCKET Friday, June 11, 1993 89-1291. State v. Sneed. Stark County, No. CA-6976. UPON CONSIDERATION of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay the execution of sentence in the above-styled cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is hereby, granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that said stay is granted for a period of six months to allow appellant an opportunity to file a petition for post-conviction relief. Absent such a filing within said time period, this stay will expire, and no further time will be granted except in unusual circumstances.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that if a petition for post-conviction relief has been filed within the time allotted, a date-stamped copy of such petition shall be filed by appellant with the Clerk of this court, and this stay shall remain in effect until exhaustion of all state post-conviction proceedings, including any appeals.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the compliance with the mandate and execution of sentence be, and the same are hereby, stayed for a period of six months or, if a petition for post-conviction relief is filed within that time period, pending the exhaustion of all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state.
91-172. State v. Mills. Hamilton County, No. C-880581. UPON CONSIDERATION of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to continue stay of execution in the above-styled cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies, and it appearing from the exhibits to the motion that a petition for post-conviction relief has been filed by appellant with the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is hereby, granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that compliance with the mandate and execution of sentence be, and the same are hereby, stayed pending the exhaustion of all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the appellant and for the appellee shall notify this court when all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state have been exhausted.
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…