635 N.E.2d 40, 41Supreme Court of Ohio.
1994.
MOTION DOCKET Thursday, July 7, 1994 87-1159. State v. Van Hook. Hamilton County, No. C-850565. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of appellee’s request to strike its motion to set execution date,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the request to strike be, and the same is hereby, granted, effective July 5, 1994.
Page 1486
94-699. State v. Patterson. Coshocton County, No. 84-CA-4. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Coshocton County. On June 15, 1994, appellant filed his reply brief which was due on June 13, 1994. Rule XIV, Section 1(C) of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, effective June 1, 1994, prohibits the filing of a brief that is not timely tendered for filing. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective July 5, 1994, that appellant’s reply brief be, and hereby is, stricken.
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…