672 N.E.2d 1119 — 1121Supreme Court of Ohio.
1996.
MOTION DOCKET Thursday, December 5, 199696-1054. Enyart v. Columbus Metro. Area Community Action Org.
Franklin App. No. 95APE08-1033. On December 2, 1996, appellees filed a motion to vacate this court’s entry granting a stay of execution of judgment dated November 22, 1996. Appellees’ motion does not meet the provisions for filing a motion to vacate under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(4)(C) because appellees filed a response to appellants’ motion for stay prior to this court’s action on the motion for stay. Appellees’ motion is, in substance, a request for reconsideration of this court’s action and, as such, is prohibited by S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that appellees’ motion to vacate the entry granting a stay of execution be, and hereby is, stricken.
96-2204. State v. Moore.
Hamilton App. No. C-950009. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of proceedings in this case and motion to withdraw as counsel and for appointment of new counsel,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this matter be remanded to the court of appeals for appointment of counsel pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(D)(2).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s brief shall be due within ninety days of the date of appointment of counsel and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.
96-2641. In re Hitchcock.
Cuyahoga App. Nos. 69291 and 69292. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to stay proceedings pending this appeal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to stay proceedings be, and hereby is, granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the proceedings in the Probate Court of Cuyahoga County be, and hereby are, stayed pending disposition of this appeal.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the original and exclusive jurisdiction of the juvenile court for the care and protection of Shampail Hitchcock and Hasting Hitchcock be, and hereby is, restored pending further order of this court.
COOK, J., would grant the stay pending determination of jurisdiction.
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…