724 N.E.2d 813Supreme Court of Ohio.
2000.
MOTION DOCKET Announcement Thursday March 2, 200096-2029. State v. White.
Ashland C.P. No. 96CRI07366. This cause came on for further consideration upon appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel for filing an application for reopening. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for appointment of counsel be, and hereby is, granted, to the extent that Michael J. Benza, who appears on the list of attorneys certified to represent capital defendants on appeal under Sup.R. 20 and as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. I(1), is hereby appointment for the purpose of representing appellant in the filing of an application for reopening in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(5).
Moyer, C.J., and Douglas, J., dissent.
96-2509. State v. White.
Ashland App. No. 96COA01182. This cause came on for further consideration upon appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel for filing an application for reopening. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for appointment of counsel be, and hereby is, granted, to the extent that Michael J. Benza, who appears on the list of attorneys certified to represent capital defendants on appeal under Sup.R. 20 and as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. I(1), is hereby appointed for the purpose of representing appellant in the filing of an application for reopening in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(5).
Moyer, C.J., and Douglas, J., dissent.
97-2003. State v. Lindsey.
Brown C.P. Nos. 972015 and 972064. Upon consideration of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay the execution of sentence in the above-styled cause pending the timely filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States,
IT IS ORDERED that said motion be, and hereby is, granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the compliance with the mandate and the execution of sentence be, and hereby are, stayed pending the timely filing of the petition in the Supreme Court of the United States.
Page 1440
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if such petition is timely filed, this stay shall continue for an indefinite period pending final disposition of this cause by the Supreme Court of the United States.
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…