165 N.E.2d 61

MOTORS INS. CORP. ET AL., APPELLANTS v. ROBINSON, SUPT., ET AL., APPELLEES.

No. 32938Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided March 19, 1952.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Insurance — Granting, renewal and revocation of agents’ licenses — Sections 644 and 644-3, General Code — Applicants’ qualifications — Conditions precedent to licensing — “Principal use” test, how applied — Applicants employed by automobile dealer — May not be licensed, when — Principal use solicitation of insurance on automobiles sold by employer — Insurance business vested with public interest — Subject to legislative control — Inalienable rights — Section 1, Article I, Constitution — Special privileges — Section 2, Article I, Constitution — Due process — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin county.

Messrs. Eagleson Laylin and Messrs. Ballard, Dresbach Crabbe, for appellants.

Mr. C. William O’Neill, attorney general, Mr. Ralph Klapp an Mr. Don W. Montgomery, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MIDDLETON, and MATTHIAS, JJ., concur.

Page 355

Tagged: