166 N.E. 202

MULHOLLAND v. THE STATE OF OHIO.

No. 20989Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided June 6, 1928.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Hancock county.

Messrs. Dunn Dunn and Mr. Otto W. Hess, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. John E. Priddy, Mr. E.C. Turner, attorney

Page 645

general, and Mr. H.E. Werner, for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

MARSHALL, C.J., KINKADE, JONES and MATTHIAS, JJ., concur.

Tagged: