703 N.E.2d 1281
No. 98-2710Supreme Court of Ohio.
December 31, 1998
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
DOUGLAS, Acting C.J.. RESNICK F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER JJ., concur.
LUNDBERG STRATTON.J., concurs because prohibition is an improper remedy.
COOK J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.
MOYER C.J., not participating.
Tuesday, January 5, 1999 DISCIPLINARY DOCKET
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…