OHIO STATE BAR ASSN. v. AM. FORECLOSURE, 124 Ohio St.3d 300 (2010)

2010-Ohio-148

OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION v. AMERICAN FORECLOSURE SPECIALISTS, L.L.C.

No. 2009-1640.Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted September 30, 2009.
Decided January 27, 2010.

ON FINAL REPORT by the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law of the Supreme Court, No. UPL 08-02.

{¶ 1} Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VII(5b), the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law has recommended our approval of a consent decree proposed by relator, Ohio State Bar Association, and respondent, American Foreclosure Specialists, L.L.C. We accept the board’s recommendation and approve the proposed consent decree submitted by the parties as follows:

{¶ 2} 1. Respondent admits that it engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by drafting and preparing a court pleading and providing it to one of its customers with instructions to file the same with the court.

{¶ 3} 2. American Foreclosure Specialists, L.L.C., its successors and assigns, and its officers, members, agents, representatives, and employees are permanently enjoined from providing legal advice and drafting and preparing court pleadings for and on behalf of residents of the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} 3. American Foreclosure Specialists, L.L.C., its successors and assigns, and its officers, members, agents, representatives, and employees are permanently enjoined from providing legal services, including the drafting of court pleadings or providing legal advice to Ohio residents or otherwise engaging in the unauthorized practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 5} 4. American Foreclosure Specialists, L.L.C., agrees to refund the sum of Nine Hundred Ninety Five Dollars ($995) to Scott A. Heffernan and Patricia A. Heffernan, which sum represents the fee paid by Scott A. Heffernan and Patricia A. Heffernan to respondent, American Foreclosure Specialists, L.L.C.

{¶ 6} 5. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VII(8)(B) and UPL Reg. 400(F), no civil penalty is to be imposed for the reasons that:

{¶ 7} a. Respondent fully and completely cooperated in the investigation of this complaint and admitted engaging in the unauthorized practice of law;

{¶ 8} b. Only one instance of the unauthorized practice of law was committed;

{¶ 9} c. Respondent has never previously been charged with the unauthorized practice of law;

Page 301

{¶ 10} d. American Foreclosure Specialists, L.L.C., agrees to refund to the affected third parties the fees charged by American Foreclosure Specialists, L.L.C.

{¶ 11} Costs are taxed to respondent.

So ordered.

MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

Buckingham, Doolittle Burroughs, L.L.P., and Robert C. Meyer; and Eugene P. Whetzel, Bar Counsel, for relator.

Jurca Lashuk, L.L.C., and Jeffrey J. Jurca, for respondent.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD. v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC., 53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)

53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…

2 years ago

McCAMMON v. COOPER, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904)

McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…

5 years ago

BANK OF AM., N.A. v. SMITH, 2018-Ohio-3638

[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…

7 years ago

STATE v. MARCUM, 2018-Ohio-1009 (2018)

[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…

8 years ago

In re A.F., 2018-Ohio-310 (Oh. App. 1/26/2018)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…

8 years ago

Ohio Attorney General Opinion No. 2017-007

March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…

8 years ago