76 N.E.2d 706

POLK, APPELLANT v. CITY OF MAPLE HEIGHTS, APPELLEE.

No. 31191Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided January 14, 1948.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Real property — Common-law dedication — Ordinances recited dedication of land for street purposes and acceptance — Land paved and used as street — Deed to dedicator never recorded — Dedication not shown by recorded plat — Subsequent sale of land at forfeited-land tax sale — Action by purchaser’s quitclaim grantee against municipality for recovery of land — Judgment for municipality — Inviolability of private property — Due process — Section 19, Article 1, Constitution — Article V, Amendments, and Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.

Mr. Thomas V. Moore, for appellant.

Mr. William C. Graves, for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., TURNER, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, SOHNGEN and STEWART, JJ., concur.

Page 13

Tagged: