678 N.E.2d 1224-1233Supreme Court of Ohio.
1997.
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET96-2690. Hicks v. O’Brien.
Licking App. No. 96CA32. Reported at 78 Ohio St.3d 1438, 676 N.E.2d 1185. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
97-11. Smith v. Ohio Dept. of Human Serv.
Clermont App. No. CA96-05-045. Reported at 78 Ohio St.3d 1439, 676 N.E.2d 1186. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
97-100. State v. Lacy.
Butler App. No. CA95-12-221. Reported at 78 Ohio St.3d 1439, 676 N.E.2d 1186. On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted and the discretionary appeal is allowed on Proposition of Law No. II only; sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 96-1871, State v. Stowers, Tuscarawas App. No. 94AP090066; briefing schedule stayed.
RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.