683 N.E.2d 343, 344Supreme Court of Ohio.
1997.

RECONSIDERATION DOCKET Wednesday, August 27, 199797-795. GTE N., Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 95-845-TP-COI. Reported at 79 Ohio St.3d 1466, 681 N.E.2d 938.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of this case for want of prosecution,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for reconsideration be, and hereby is, denied.

RESNICK, J., not participating.

97-1039. State v. Lee.

Cuyahoga App. No. 70122. Reported at 79 Ohio St.3d 1470, 682 N.E.2d 655.

Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of this case for want of prosecution filed by counsel for appellant, and the motion for leave to file a memorandum in support of jurisdiction pro se filed by appellant pro se,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for reconsideration and the motion for leave be, and hereby are, denied.

97-1087. Reese v. Mitchell.

Trumbull App. No. 96-T-5622. Reported at 79 Ohio St.3d 1470, 682 N.E.2d 655.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of this case for want of prosecution,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for reconsideration be, and hereby is, denied.

Tagged: