RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 88 Ohio St.3d 1438 (2000)

724 N.E.2d 812Supreme Court of Ohio.
2000.

RECONSIDERATION DOCKET Announcement Wednesday March 1, 200097-2003. State v. Lindsey.

Brown C.P. Nos. 972015 and 972064. Reported at 87 Ohio St.3d 479, 721 N.E.2d 995. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

98-238. Pesek v. Univ. Neurologists Assn., Inc.

Cuyahoga App. No. 71637. Reported at 87 Ohio St.3d 495, 721 N.E.2d 1011. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

98-2521. C.I.V.I.C. Group v. Warren.

Trumbull App. No. 98-T-0001. On February 25, 2000, amici curiae
the City of Dublin et al. filed a document titled “Motion of Amici Curiae The City of Dublin, the Village of New Albany, The City of Toledo, The City of Maumee, The City of Rossford, and the Ohio Municipal League for Prior Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration.” Whereas the document contains argument and citations in support of reconsideration, it is not in compliance with S.Ct.Prac.R. XI, Section 2, which prescribes that an amicus curiae may not file a motion for reconsideration without prior leave of this court. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion be, and hereby is, stricken.

99-159. Mossing v. State Farm Ins. Co.

Lucas App. No. L-98-1052. Reported at 87 Ohio St.3d 1240, 721 N.E.2d 407. On motion for reconsideration and on amicus curiae
motion for leave to file under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI. Motions denied.

99-876. State ex rel. Cobb v. R.O. Wetz Transp. Co.

Franklin App. No. 98AP-103. Reported at 87 Ohio St.3d 452, 721 N.E.2d 404. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Resnick, J., dissents.

99-1445. Crittenden Court Apts. Assoc. L.P. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd.of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 98-A-356. Reported at 87 Ohio St.3d 1487, 722 N.E.2d 522. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Page 1439