REFINING CO. v. CHANEY, 174 Ohio St. 379 (1963)

189 N.E.2d 443

SINCLAIR REFINING CO., APPELLEE v. CHANEY ET AL., APPELLEES; CHANEY, APPELLANT[*]

No. 37908Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided March 20, 1963.

[*] For earlier litigation in this matter, see 114 Ohio App. 538.

Supreme Court — Dismissal sua sponte — No debatable constitutional question involved — Liens — Action to marshal, and for sale of real estate — Priority.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Seneca County.

Mr. Thomas R. Spellerberg, prosecuting attorney, for appellee Sinclair Refining Company.

Mr. Samuel R. McKinney, for appellee Tiffin Savings Bank.

Messrs. Spitler Flynn, for appellee France Sales, Inc.

Mr. Bonford R. Talbert, Jr., for appellant.

Page 380

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed sua sponte for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O’NEILL, GRIFFITH, HERBERT and GIBSON, JJ., concur.