186 N.E. 93

ROBERTS v. THE STATE OF OHIO.

No. 24022Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided April 5, 1933.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.

Mr. J.E. Sater and Mr. Horace S. Kerr, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Donald J. Hoskins, prosecuting attorney, Mr. Ralph J. Bartlett, and Mr. Forrest R. Detrick, for defendant in error.

Page 430

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., DAY, ALLEN, STEPHENSON and JONES, JJ., concur.

KINKADE, J., not participating.

Tagged: