699 N.E.2d 949

Shamansky v. Massachusetts Fin. Serv. Co.

98-1114.Supreme Court of Ohio.
September 23, 1998.

DISCRETIONARY APPEALS NOT ALLOWED
Franklin App. No. 97APE08-1037. On discretionary appeal and motion for admission pro hac vice of T.S.L, Perlman. Discretionary appeal and motion denied.

PFEIFER, J., dissents.

Tagged: