SMITH v. SMITH, 105 Ohio St.3d 1477 (2005)

2005-Ohio-1458

SMITH v. SMITH.

No. 2004-1293.Supreme Court of Ohio.
March 29, 2005.

Hancock App. No. 5-03-12, 2004-Ohio-3552.

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

This cause is scheduled for oral argument on March 30, 2005. Upon consideration of the motion of appellant’s counsel for a continuance of the oral argument and appellee’s memorandum opposing the motion,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the oral argument in this case will be continued to a date to be determined by the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that, by April 1, 2005, appellant’s counsel will file a certificate of a medical authority confirming the medical condition that renders appellant’s counsel unable to attend oral argument on March 30.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD. v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC., 53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)

53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…

2 years ago

McCAMMON v. COOPER, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904)

McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…

5 years ago

BANK OF AM., N.A. v. SMITH, 2018-Ohio-3638

[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…

7 years ago

STATE v. MARCUM, 2018-Ohio-1009 (2018)

[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…

8 years ago

In re A.F., 2018-Ohio-310 (Oh. App. 1/26/2018)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…

8 years ago

Ohio Attorney General Opinion No. 2017-007

March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…

8 years ago