172 N.E. 379

SNOOK v. THE STATE OF OHIO.

No. 22030Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided December 24, 1929.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.

Mr. E.O. Ricketts, Mr. Arthur C. Fricke, Mr. Arthur M. Spiegel, Mr. John F. Seidel and Mr. M.C. Seyfert, for plaintiff in error.

Page 626

Mr. John J. Chester, Jr., prosecuting attorney, Mr. Myron B. Gessaman, Mr. Paul C. Hicks and Mr. Robert J. Odell, for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

MARSHALL, C.J., KINKADE, MATTHIAS, DAY and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Tagged: