698 N.E.2d 437
98-1397.Supreme Court of Ohio.
August 26, 1998
In Mandamus.
This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On August 21, 1998, relator filed a motion for extension of time to respond to respondents motion to dismiss and motion to compel. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(3)(B) prohibits requests for extensions of time to file responses to motions,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua spouts, that relator’s motion for extension of time be, and hereby is, stricken.
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…