STATE, EX REL. HELD, v. INDUS. COMM., 59 Ohio St.3d 66 (1991)

570 N.E.2d 274

[THE STATE, EX REL.] HELD, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

No. 90-1894Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted February 5, 1991 —
Decided April 24, 1991.

Workers’ compensation — Commission’s order granting or denying benefits to a claimant must specifically state what portion of the evidence has been relied upon, and briefly explain the reasoning for its decision.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 90AP-401.

Butler, Cincione, DiCuccio Dritz and David B. Barnhart, for appellant.

Lee I. Fisher, attorney general, Michael L. Squillace an Teresa Oglesby-McIntyre, for appellee Industrial Commission.

Baker Hostetler, R. Christopher Doyle and Stephen J. Habash, for appellee Worthington Board of Education.

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in State, ex rel. Noll, v. Indus. Comm.
(1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and issue a limited writ returning the cause to the commission to identify the nonmedical disability factors on which it relied and to briefly explain the reasons for its decision.

Judgment reversed and limited writ issued.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

Page 67