700 N.E.2d 877

State ex rel. Licking Cty. v. Licking Mem. Hosp.

98-1733.Supreme Court of Ohio.
October 19, 1998

Appeal from the In Mandamus.

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On October 5, 1998, respondent filed a motion for leave to file a reply to relator’s memorandum contra respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. “Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(4) prohibits a reply to a memorandum opposing a motion,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to file a reply to relators’ memorandum contra respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be, and hereby is, denied.

MERIT DOCKET

Tagged: