2006-Ohio-1249, 844 N.E.2d 353

State ex rel. Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.

No. 2006-0291.Supreme Court of Ohio.
March 20, 2006.

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On relator’s motion for stay of execution of the order issued by the Public Utilities Commission, respondent’s motion to dismiss, the motion for leave to intervene of the city of Columbus, the motion to dismiss of the city of Columbus, the motion for leave to intervene of Nationwide Realty Investors Ltd., and relator’s motion to strike respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion for stay of execution is denied. Motions for leave to intervene are granted. Motion to strike respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted in part, and the evidence attached to respondent’s motion to

Page 1499

dismiss is stricken. Motions to dismiss are granted. Cause dismissed.

O’DONNELL, J., would deny the motions to dismiss.