522 N.E.2d 1088

THE STATE, EX REL. RHODES, APPELLANT, v. VAN BROCKLIN, APPELLEE.

No. 88-17Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided May 11, 1988.

Mandamus — Writ denied when adequate remedy at law exists.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County.

Vincent C. Rhodes, pro se.
Gary L. Van Brocklin, prosecuting attorney, and Mary Jane Stephens, for appellee.

On the basis that appellant has an adequate remedy at law, the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint in mandamus (case No. 87 CA 176) is affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, LOCHER, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT and H. BROWN, JJ., concur.

Tagged: