2005-Ohio-900, 823 N.E.2d 875
2005-0123.Supreme Court of Ohio.
March 4, 2005.
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On February 25, 2005, respondents filed a memorandum opposing relator’s motion for leave to
Page 1457
introduce deposition testimony. The deadline for filing a memorandum in opposition to the motion was January 31, 2005. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits untimely filings,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondents’ memorandum opposing relator’s motion for leave to introduce deposition testimony be, and hereby is, stricken.
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…