93 N.E.2d 409
Nos. 32236 and 32240Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided June 14, 1950.
Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Extortion — Section 13384, General Code — Extorting interest in gambling business — Joint indictment and trial — Sufficiency of evidence — Claimed error in admission and rejection of evidence — Misconduct of prosecuting attorney — Charge to jury — Fair and impartial trial.
APPEALS from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.
Page 105
Mr. Frank T. Cullitan, prosecuting attorney, Mr. Saul S. Danaceau and Mr. Victor DeMarco, for appellee.
Mr. Lawrence E. Appleton, for appellant William A. Hoge.
Mr. Dan W. Duffy and Mr. Bernard Friedman, for appellant Arthur Drake.
It is ordered and adjudged that these appeals as of right be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeals dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TURNER and TAFT, JJ., concur.