2005-Ohio-763, 826 N.E.2d 857

STATE v. AHMED.

2001-0871.Supreme Court of Ohio.
March 2, 2005.

Belmont C.P. No. 99-CR-192.

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

On motion for leave to amend, and on application for reopening under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6). Motions denied because the appellant failed to comply with the 90-day filing deadline in S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6)(A).

PFEIFER, J., dissents.