STATE v. CARROLL, 156 Ohio St. 162 (1951)

101 N.E.2d 294

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE v. CARROLL, APPELLANT.

No. 32722Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided October 3, 1951.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Acting in way “tending to cause delinquency in such child” — Section 1639-45, General Code — Not indefinite or uncertain — “Child,’ construed — Affidavit sufficient, when — Due process — Section 16, Article 1, Constitution — Article 14, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit county.

Mr. Alva J. Russell, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Robert E. Mohler, for appellee.

Mr. E. Guy Hammond, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, MATTHIAS, and HART, JJ., concur.

Page 163