2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 327

State v. Chewning.

2005-0185.Supreme Court of Ohio.
May 11, 2005.

Clermont App. No. CA2004-01-002, 2004-Ohio-6661.

APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.

MOYER, C.J., LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III and hold the cause for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2005-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209.