2005-Ohio-1666

STATE v. HARDIE.

No. 2005-0088.Supreme Court of Ohio.
April 13, 2005.

Montgomery App. No. 19954, 2004-Ohio-6783.

APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law III and hold the cause for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga

Page 1501

App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209.

Tagged: