2011-Ohio-5139
No. 2007-1741.Supreme Court of Ohio.
October 6, 2011.
Stark C.P. No. 2006CR1824A.
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of appellant’s motions for stay of execution scheduled for June 19, 2013, and for appointment of counsel for purpose of filing an application for reopening. Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that the motions are granted.
It is further ordered that the stay shall remain in effect until exhaustion of all state post-conviction proceedings, including any appeals. Counsel for appellant and for appellee shall notify this court when all proceedings for postconviction relief before the courts of this state have been exhausted.
It is further ordered by the court that the Ohio Public Defender’s office is appointed to represent appellant in this case.
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…